16/10/2006 11:00:07

Helsinki Stock Exchange: Disciplinary fine of EUR 20,000 ...

Disciplinary fine of EUR 20,000 for Benefon Oyj for violating the

disclosure rules

The Disciplinary Committee of the Helsinki Stock Exchange has decided to

issue Benefon Oyj a disciplinary fine of EUR 20,000 for the violation of

the regulations regarding the disclosure obligation.

On October 26, 2005, Benefon Oyj released its result and turnover

forecast for 2006. According to the estimate, the turnover from the

accounting year 2006 was expected to be approximately EUR 66.5 million

and the net result EUR 7.5 million. The starting of the sales of a new

product during the first quarter of 2006 and related distribution and

production agreements formed the basis of the estimate.

The majority of the company's estimated turnover and result were

intended to be reached with the new product. The company stated that the

estimates are based on assumptions and they include uncertainties. The

company added reservations to the estimate concerning funding, personnel

stability, growth management and ability to cope with mobile

communication changes and trends.

The Disciplinary Committee determined that the turnover and result

estimates presented by Benefon were accurate. The risks related to the

estimates were on the other hand presented loosely, and it was not

possible for investors to assess the risk probability or effects on

their basis.

The Disciplinary Committee points out that a listed company cannot

efficiently withdraw from responding to its future estimates by

presenting such reservations concerning general business risks.

Reservations related to the future development views must be as

thoroughly grounded as the numeric values.

Profit warning and release of changed information

The Disciplinary Committee considers it proven that Benefon did not

release substantial changes in its result and turnover estimates without

undue delay during the period January 12-May 19, 2006 (`profit warning'

regulations 3.2.43-3.2.47), or changed information concerning the

release of its new product (regulation 3.1.7).

On January 12, 2006, the company repeated the presented result estimate

regarding the production and sales of the new product to be started

during the first quarter of 2006. The majority of the company's foreseen

turnover was intended to be reached with the product. On May 19, 2006,

the company released information that the launch of the new product

sales was to be postponed to the third quarter of 2006 and, as a result,

the company cannot reach the estimated result in 2006. The Committee saw

that the company management must have been aware of the change

substantially earlier than on May 19, 2006 when the information was

released in connection with the interim report. The changes in the

estimate and previously released information should have been released

without undue delay after the change had become apparent and the

management was aware of them. The company has not presented reasons why

the project delay was not a surprise to the management until the release

of the interim report. The Committee concluded that, considering the

significance of the information, the violation must be regarded as

serious.

The diligence obligation for the management of a listed company requires

that it has sufficient reporting systems with which the result and

turnover development is monitored. Because the product was of

considerable importance for the company and the development of the

company's financial situation almost entirely depended on the product,

the company management had a special obligation to monitor this project.

Consistency of information

The Disciplinary Committee noted that the company has used the term

'launching' in its released announcements in a manner that has been

inconsistent and misleading to investors (regulation 3.1.2). The company

has not provided sufficient or consistent information on the issue which

might have misled investors.

Concurrence of communications

The Disciplinary Committee also noted that Benefon has violated the

concurrence requirement for communications (regulations 3.1.1 and

3.1.8). On June 26, 2006, the company released a press release

concerning the new product schedules and result estimate revisions. The

company made the issue official with a stock exchange release on June

28, 2006.

Section 3.1.1 in the Stock Exchange rules concerns the communication

obligation regarding listed companies. According to the regulation, the

obligation to provide information is designed to ensure that all parties

operating in the market simultaneously have at their disposal sufficient

and correct information on the issuer of listed securities and the

listed security, in order that the value of shares and other listed

securities may be determined in a well-founded manner. Investors use

information disclosed by issuers in evaluating their listed securities.

The Disciplinary Committee stated on the company's initial situation

that Benefon has gone through a business re-organization process, which

ended in June 2005. The company's securities are on the surveillance

list in the Helsinki Stock Exchange. In this case, the purpose of the

surveillance list has been to direct investors' attention to the

company's financial position. On the basis of this, the requirements of

the obligation for providing information cannot however be compromised.

Investors must be able to rely on the company to provide only

well-founded future estimates.

The Helsinki Stock Exchange directs investors' attention to the fact

that Benefon Oyj's share is on the surveillance list. On the basis of

the decision of the Disciplinary Committee, the Stock Exchange notes

that the regulation concerning the transfer to the observation segment,

2.1.8 ii) a serious breach of other exchange rules pertaining to listed

companies, is also met.

Resolution

The Disciplinary Committee of the Helsinki Stock Exchange stated that

Benefon Oyj has violated the rules of the stock exchange. These

violations cannot be considered minor. The Committee ordered Benefon

Oyj to pay a disciplinary fine of EUR 20,000. The seriousness of the

violations and the company size were taken into account when calculating

the amount of the disciplinary fine.

For more information:

Timo Rintanen, Secretary of the Disciplinary Committee, Head of

Enforcement +358 9 6166 7640

Janne Seppänen, Head of Surveillance +358 9 6166 7382

The Helsinki Stock Exchange donates its disciplinary fines to a

foundation that sponsors research related to securities markets in

Finland and Sweden.

Further information about the Disciplinary Committee and its members, as

well as the regulations of the Disciplinary Committee, are available on

the Helsinki Stock Exchange website at www.omxgroup.com/helsinginporssi.

Market surveillance of the Helsinki Stock Exchange

The surveillance unit of the Helsinki Stock Exchange investigates all

suspected breaches of regulations. Minor breaches will result in

written criticism of the company, whereas more serious cases are

referred to the Disciplinary Committee.

The members of the Disciplinary Committee are legal and financial

experts independent of the Helsinki Stock Exchange. The Chairman of the

Committee is Mr. Mikko Tulokas, Supreme Court Justice, and the members

are Professor Risto Nuolimaa, Professor Kalervo Virtanen and

Mr. Simo-Pekka Helander LL.M.

The possible sanctions for a breach of regulations include a reprimand,

a warning, a disciplinary fine and, in extreme cases, a de-listing

proposal.

------------------------------------------------------------

This information was brought to you by Waymaker http://www.waymaker.net

The following files are available for download:

http://wpy.waymaker.net/client/waymaker1/f.aspx?id=300510&fn=wkr0010.pdf

Popular news

LatestMost read
 

Post comment

Version: LiveBranchBuild_20100824.3 - EUROSRV20 - 2010-09-02 21:24:09 - 2010-09-02 20:24:09 - 3 - Website: OKAY